Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:24:30 +0000 From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> To: avg@icyb.net.ua, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d/mountd: confusing message (and behavior?) Message-ID: <E1LLfhO-000LfO-UH@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> In-Reply-To: <4968AE90.5010004@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Alsp, should it actually fail like this? I have ZFS and I plan to do > all NFS exports from ZFS, so /etc/exports would never be used. ZFS writes its own exports file to '/etc/zfs/exports' - as far as I can tell this is pretty much all that happens when you mark a filesystem as NFS shared under ZFS. Then mountd is started from rc like this: /usr/sbin/mountd -r -n /etc/exports /etc/zfs/exports (thats taken from 'ps' on one of my running systems) So you still need an empty /etc/exports to be there. ZFS will take care of managing it's own exports file, but thats all it seems to do - there is no magic ZFS seperate implementation of NFS as far as I know. -pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1LLfhO-000LfO-UH>