Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:42:58 +0200 From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> To: Vladislav V. Prodan <universite@ukr.net> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Prompt to synchronize two volumes ZFS Message-ID: <691E4C9D-A9C5-425A-B4B0-5D8118D77A17@sarenet.es> In-Reply-To: <4DAD6CEB.4060101@ukr.net> References: <4DAC7811.3090407@ukr.net> <BANLkTinsvVzaY9yiQ5QvVGK7gg7cPFMRcA@mail.gmail.com> <4DAC96EA.8080505@ukr.net> <BANLkTim-zK1cgjbaqDFQfmXWNVD4rCLEkw@mail.gmail.com> <3596CB9B-7996-404B-AD34-D3A8DFD67FD4@sarenet.es> <4DAD6CEB.4060101@ukr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 19, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > 19.04.2011 11:15, Borja Marcos wrote: >> Moreover, although ZFS receive seems to be robust in case a = replication stream is interrupted, I find it much more safer to move the = stream beforehand, and start the zfs receive with a complete stream. >=20 > This is if there's a place on a remote server, and if not? > How to transfer snapshots, then? Well, in that case you need a pipe. Something like zfs send blah blah | = ssh destination zfs receive blah blah But remember, you might have problems. Borja.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?691E4C9D-A9C5-425A-B4B0-5D8118D77A17>