Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 00:47:01 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely7.cicely.de, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: no da* with umass on RM9200 Message-ID: <20090418224701.GD16463@cicely7.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20090418.151808.-169119528.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20090418190824.GC16463@cicely7.cicely.de> <200904182212.52142.hselasky@c2i.net> <20090418.151808.-169119528.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 03:18:08PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <200904182212.52142.hselasky@c2i.net> > Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> writes: > : On Saturday 18 April 2009, Bernd Walter wrote: > : > Just updated to recent current today - mainly to try the new USB code > : > on RM9200. > : > USB devices are detected fine, but with umass I don't get any disk > : > devices, although support for pass and da is compiled into the kernel. > : > I tried a few different umass flash reader, which are all know to work. > : > > : > : The new USB code also supports the UDP (USB Device Port). I know, but my board has no UDP support. > : How does your kernel config file look? > > The AT91RM9200 has three USB ports. Two are USB Host ports. One is > the device port. I thikn that Bernd is complaining that his flash > drives plugged into the usb host ports were detected as umass device, > but no da0 was attached. Exactly. > There were some changes to CAM recently that broke this, and some even > more recently that I think fixed something akin to this... Ah - I was a bit surprised about that because I saw earlier reports where umass worked. Umass and hubs both never worked for me on the RM9200, but it is long time ago since I tested. -- B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090418224701.GD16463>