Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:42:32 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Thomas Mueller <mueller6724@bellsouth.net>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Status of math/gnumeric unable to keep up with upstream releases? Message-ID: <CADLo83-Skyzcn0VPUugQUVbPzygc9kUAMsLp4RtZDu0BPSA%2B=g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51288E35.1070301@rainbow-runner.nl> References: <CD.60.09449.776D7215@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> <51288E35.1070301@rainbow-runner.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 Feb 2013 09:39, "Koop Mast" <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl> wrote: > > On 22-2-2013 21:35, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> >> What is the status of gnumeric being stuck at 1.10.17 when upstream has released 1.12.0 ? >> >> I think gnumeric >= 1.11.x has gtk+ >= 3.0.0 as a dependency? I checked gnumeric web site www.gnumeric.org . >> >> I see this is the same snag that prevents transmission > 2.5 from building, though possibly one could do >> >> portmaster -o transmission-cli transmission ? >> >> So what is the status now of gtk+ 3.x ? >> >> >> Tom > > > I'm working on a update for glib20 and gtk+2 and gtk+3. gnumeric is on the list of ports to update afterwards. What I know of transmission is that only transmission-gtk is currently broken because it wants a newer gtk+3 version then we got in ports. That's exactly right. Transmission's older version in the tree works just fine however. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-Skyzcn0VPUugQUVbPzygc9kUAMsLp4RtZDu0BPSA%2B=g>