Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Nov 2021 12:37:25 +0100
From:      =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= <mgorny@moritz.systems>
To:        "Floyd, Paul" <paulf2718@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: llvm/clang upstream
Message-ID:  <2cd0ba0002db6d25c41a8dc8f2a856b372370605.camel@moritz.systems>
In-Reply-To: <43a13a6b-baee-e8cb-3624-ee98da510ad0@gmail.com>
References:  <43a13a6b-baee-e8cb-3624-ee98da510ad0@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2021-11-30 at 12:08 +0100, Floyd, Paul wrote:
> Not sure where the best place is to ask this.
> 
> Any ideas why llvm seems so incredibly slow in taking FreeBSD patches?
> 
> It would be nice to be able to just 'git clone && cmake && make' 
> (roughly speaking).

In my opinion, LLVM is an overgrown project whose organization structure
didn't follow.  I don't know about FreeBSD patches specifically
but in general the hardest part is finding someone to approve your
patch.  Many patches rot without a single reply from anyone, and I think
the whole process discourages people from trying.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2cd0ba0002db6d25c41a8dc8f2a856b372370605.camel>