Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:20:11 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Actual Question! Message-ID: <op.udon7xcm9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <486BEC5F.1060108@p6m7g8.com> References: <486BEC5F.1060108@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:00:15 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci
<pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> wrote:
> $ grep rubygem MFiles | \
> xargs grep DEPENDS | \
> grep rubygem |grep -c LOCALBASE
> 9
>
> $ grep rubygem MFiles | \
> xargs grep DEPENDS | \
> grep rubygem | \
> grep -v LOCALBASE | \
> wc -l
> 91
>
> So it looks like the second form is preferred. If you wondering, thats
> the difference between these:
>
>
> devel/rubygem-rgl/Makefile:RUN_DEPENDS=
> ${LOCALBASE}/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/specifications/stream-0.5.gemspec:${PORTSDIR}/devel/rubygem-stream
>
> vs
>
> www/rubygem-rubyfulsoup/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS=
> rubygem-htmltools>=1.10:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/rubygem-htmltools
>
>
> IMHO the second is better, because you can use >= or leave it out and
> not break higher level ports every-time you upgrade a lower one.
>
> I'm going to a file a PR to change the 9 ports shortly.
Have you check rubygem's dependencies requirement before you care about
how much dependencies there are? Just make sure in case. ;-)
Cheers,
Mezz
--
mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.udon7xcm9aq2h7>