Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:49:54 +0200
From:      Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de>
To:        Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches)
Message-ID:  <42AB4E72.8000400@incubus.de>
In-Reply-To: <003201c56ec6$86c0a800$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
References:  <20050525052214.GA76339@xor.obsecurity.org><42940C87.5000705@incubus.de><20050525053054.GA76491@xor.obsecurity.org><4294AB75.9080908@incubus.de><20050525185427.GB92006@xor.obsecurity.org><4294CC9A.1000200@incubus.de> <4295153A.9010605@incubus.de><20050608225141.GA77978@xor.obsecurity.org><42A77DC3.8060304@incubus.de> <42AB40ED.90008@incubus.de> <20050611200451.GA42341@xor.obsecurity.org> <003201c56ec6$86c0a800$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steven Hartland wrote:

> With the patch things are MUCH better. No problems to report and
> the server is under major load including some heavy disk access as

Yeah, no problems here either, so far.

mkb.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42AB4E72.8000400>