Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:25:50 +0200
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
To:        David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>,  Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org, "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   bsd.sys.mk [-Wno-uninitialized]
Message-ID:  <53C4F39E.2030407@selasky.org>
In-Reply-To: <771D269B-AC6D-4686-ABB0-04F7DCD3A8D9@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20140704123901.GR6056@albert.catwhisker.org> <53B6E218.5070009@selasky.org> <20140704174705.GS6056@albert.catwhisker.org> <53B6EDD1.8030506@selasky.org> <20140704181831.GV6056@albert.catwhisker.org> <909248A4-1B7C-4836-ADAA-F81A70A8AC3C@theravensnest.org> <F7112AF8-82DD-410D-97A1-C01FFB49B3B4@FreeBSD.org> <771D269B-AC6D-4686-ABB0-04F7DCD3A8D9@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/05/14 15:10, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 5 Jul 2014, at 14:07, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
>> Interestingly, -Wno-uninitialized has been in bsd.sys.mk since r76861,
>> and the accompanying comment ("XXX Delete -Wuninitialized by default for
>> now -- the compiler doesn't always get it right") has never been
>> changed. :-)
>>
>> It is probably time to re-enable that warning after 13 years, at least.
>
> It probably only wants enabling for clang.  GCC (at least, GCC 4.2.1) performs this analysis based on analyses run by the optimisers and so the warnings are dependent on optimisation level.
>
> David

Hi,

Is someone working on this?

--HPS




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53C4F39E.2030407>