Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Nov 2005 06:35:33 +0100
From:      Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, George Katsanos <gkatsanos@gmail.com>, Frank Staals <frankstaals@gmx.net>, questions@freebsd.org, "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: KDE Konqueror:Can i have konqueror without KDEstuff port
Message-ID:  <200511110635.39665.lofi@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <ab581e310511091239i5df7c60do6f6ba4a0e0d6edb6@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAAwDSDOzhsU2rBtGtW4YaQsKAAAAQAAAAsX7319CI50%2Bf5uN/kLBz9gEAAAAA@gmail.com> <43720CCD.1060200@gmx.net> <ab581e310511091239i5df7c60do6f6ba4a0e0d6edb6@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1593154.9u9Uesul4n
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday, 9. November 2005 21:39, Jack L. wrote:

>  I have the same setup, except I only want konsole and konqueror for file
> browsing and a terminal. I wonder if kde will ever split up those
> applications into different pieces.

Most probably never - KDE tries to make a desktop environment, not a browse=
r=20
and a terminal emulator. If there's a trend, then it's rather towards tight=
er=20
integration instead.

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--nextPart1593154.9u9Uesul4n
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBDdC2rXhc68WspdLARAhWoAKCKipoxdtSP3Zwfq0gaRjj4Cwkh+gCfaDw7
tHYpKeLFEbSQyooz0U+jjc0=
=upAx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1593154.9u9Uesul4n--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511110635.39665.lofi>