Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 21:16:37 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ICU sweeping upgrade: bug or feature? Message-ID: <20140208201637.GJ80056@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1uefH3ec5B892PdqomQkZ9mRk3KENnXb7s5abFHVAcijw@mail.gmail.com> References: <52F6132C.3070406@netfence.it> <52F6654F.4070304@netfence.it> <20140208200042.GI80056@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAN6yY1uefH3ec5B892PdqomQkZ9mRk3KENnXb7s5abFHVAcijw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pMCBjikF2xGw87uL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 12:14:56PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > You need to bump gobject-introspection and glib20, as well. I'll report a= ny > others I find later after the rebuild of those you caught and a run of > pkg_libchk. >=20 No glib only depends on icu if one option is set which default to off, and = then glib20 pollutes tons of other ports. regards, Bapt --pMCBjikF2xGw87uL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlL2kKUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwOmQCfTSyBDWczqb2PNi6DRdHb01am 3hsAoILmMylgzHz+5KnNacRiZdn6WhYh =5Fuj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pMCBjikF2xGw87uL--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140208201637.GJ80056>