Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:11:39 +0100
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        walt <wa1ter@myrealbox.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Why did INVARIANTS hide the geom bug? 
Message-ID:  <2506.1047885099@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Mar 2003 10:12:51 PST." <3E74BEA3.6070603@myrealbox.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3E74BEA3.6070603@myrealbox.com>, walt writes:
>If inclusion of INVARIANTS serves to disguise bugs in
>the kernel, I wonder if kernel committers should be
>using this option routinely?

Please check into our current reality :-)

Suggest you check what INVARIANTS actually do.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2506.1047885099>