Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 16:51:11 +0400 From: Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org> To: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, nork@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/mesa-demos Makefile Message-ID: <201010091651.11964.makc@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4CAF93F2.4070302@freebsd.org> References: <201010082040.o98KeiLK018228@repoman.freebsd.org> <201010090147.35123.makc@freebsd.org> <4CAF93F2.4070302@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 23:58:10 +0200, Rene Ladan wrote: > On 08-10-2010 23:47, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 20:40:44 +0000 (UTC), Rene Ladan wrote: > >> rene 2010-10-08 20:40:44 UTC > >> > >> FreeBSD ports repository > >> > >> Modified files: > >> graphics/mesa-demos Makefile > >> > >> Log: > >> Only mark broken if WITHOUT_NOUVEAU is not defined > > > > I wonder why one should define WITHOUT_NOUVEAU to build port. Any reason > > to not set it by default? > > The difference that the knob makes is that when set it fetches version > 7.4.x of the port (for which the distfiles got moved or deleted), and > when not set it fetches version 7.6.x of the port (which works just fine). UPDATING says the reverse. Choosing between the latest version of mesa- demos/libGL* ports and stagnated xf86-video-nouveau I'd vote for mesa-demos. Is there any objection to changing the defaults? > WITHOUT_NOUVEAU, when not set, is used to build the > x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau port. See UPDATING/20100207 > > Rene
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201010091651.11964.makc>