Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:17:24 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r377495 - head/textproc/py-pygments Message-ID: <54BE0F14.5030304@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20150120081220.GB57237@FreeBSD.org> References: <201501200412.t0K4CVOj052563@svn.freebsd.org> <20150120081220.GB57237@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/20/2015 09:12, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:12:31AM +0000, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> New Revision: 377495 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/377495 >> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r377495/ >> >> Log: >> Update to 2.0.1. >> >> [...] >> -OPTIONS_DEFINE= DOCS >> - > > Commit log does not mention this change, was it intended? If so, what was > the reason behind it? > The line is redundant -- it's presence or absence doesn't change anything. You know how I write commit messages and thus know I agree it could have been mentioned given how short the message was (if it were 1 of 100 changes I wouldn't have mentioned it myself). John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54BE0F14.5030304>