Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:51:44 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ule+preempt? Message-ID: <20050426185144.GA25420@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com> References: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:15:56AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some months. > i am wondering if the waters have become relatively safe to go > to ule with preemption? No, it can cause panics and is not yet reliable in my testing. Kris --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCbo3AWry0BWjoQKURAkpsAKDKCJSOR/3ohUrvM1EUMpe+EMrh3wCgglHu ReGd1rLmH0wheGZX6zSLhwk= =Y8X4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050426185144.GA25420>