Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 03 Jun 2000 14:57:49 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/locale big5.c euc.c mskanji.c runetype.c setlocale.c setrunelocale.c table.c tolower.c toupper.c utf2.c 
Message-ID:  <6380.960037069@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 03 Jun 2000 05:52:52 PDT." <20000603055251.A25576@freebsd.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000603055251.A25576@freebsd.org>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
>On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 02:45:35PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <20000603054355.A24274@freebsd.org>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
>> >On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 05:24:09AM -0700, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>> >>   Megre XPG4 code into libc
>> >
>> >This is not full XPG4 standard of course, but our libxpg4 subset.
>> 
>> I thought we had an age old core decision to leave this out of
>> libc ?  Has that decision been re-evaluated without me noticing ?
>
>This was not core decision but my decision after some talks with Nate in one 
>of the freebsd lists as I remember.  The reasons are obsolete.  Now any 
>i18n-enabled application requires libxpg4 so simple way is always enable it 
>to not differs from other systems much.  This will not cause performance 
>degradation and only little code grows for static binaries.

If all i18n apps require -lxpg4 why merge this into -lc ?

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6380.960037069>