Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 04:06:18 -0800 (PST) From: Jeffrey Bouquet <jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Was: Status of math/gnumeric [req] coincide with another (png) maybe... Message-ID: <1361621178.58726.YahooMailClassic@web164002.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <51288E35.1070301@rainbow-runner.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- On Sat, 2/23/13, Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl> wrote: From: Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl> Subject: Re: Status of math/gnumeric unable to keep up with upstream releas= es? To: "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6724@bellsouth.net> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Saturday, February 23, 2013, 1:39 AM On 22-2-2013 21:35, Thomas Mueller wrote: > What is the status of gnumeric being stuck at 1.10.17 when upstream has r= eleased 1.12.0 ? > > I think gnumeric >=3D 1.11.x has gtk+ >=3D 3.0.0 as a dependency?=A0 I ch= ecked gnumeric web site www.gnumeric.org . > > I see this is the same snag that prevents transmission > 2.5 from buildin= g, though possibly one could do > > portmaster -o transmission-cli transmission ? > > So what is the status now of gtk+ 3.x ? > > > Tom >I'm working on a update for glib20 and gtk+2 and gtk+3. gnumeric is on=20 the list of ports to update afterwards. What I know of transmission is=20 that only transmission-gtk is currently broken because it wants a newer=20 >>gtk+3 version then we got in ports. >>-Koop _______________________________________________ ... Could both glib20/gtk20 *and* png be delayed until both are ready, so perso= ns could upgrade ports depending upon both simultaneously?=A0 (If the latter i= s a shared library bump anyway...) J. Bouquet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1361621178.58726.YahooMailClassic>