Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:25:48 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com> To: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unix command-line tools to edit SharePoint site? Message-ID: <483F1F5C.5060101@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: <a9f4a3860805281615o43683b4lf31646ed2a83968c@mail.gmail.com> References: <26face530805241258y199474edkcef7f79f8569b216@mail.gmail.com> <4838981D.4010906@onetel.com> <a9f4a3860805261929w175c42afm1d1da8d3831e206d@mail.gmail.com> <483DE440.8040308@onetel.com> <a9f4a3860805281615o43683b4lf31646ed2a83968c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kurt Buff wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com> wrote: >> Kurt Buff wrote: >>> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com> >>> wrote: >>>> http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ >>>> >>>> Chris >>> If you want to use some/many/most of the core utils on Windows, you'll >>> be much better off with http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net >>> >>> unxutils seems pretty moribund, and I have not been successful >>> downloading the updates from that site for a while. >>> >>> Kurt >> I'll have a look at these, thanks for the suggestion. I have to say though >> the unxutils commands that I have used work perfectly well despite their >> age, don't require cygwin and don't do silly registry things on windows. I >> need this as I'm using them on a work computer which I am not allowed to >> install software on :P >> >> Chris > > The unxutils work well, but the gnuwin32 stuff is a bit more current, > and more complete. They don't require any registry fiddling nor extra > DLLs, either, just like the unxutils stuff. I stick them in a > directory, and set my path up with that. Works well for me, anyway. > > > HTH, > > Kurt Cool! I will definitely check these out, thanks. (Sorry list, OT) Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?483F1F5C.5060101>