Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:07:27 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, allen paul <allen.paul72@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Ref : Permission to use parts of FreeBSD documentation on My Website Message-ID: <20071018110727.GD1563@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <471646D9.2020205@gmail.com> References: <258baeb80710171334h62adb855gb0191e8c32f6d62a@mail.gmail.com> <47164479.5050604@gmail.com> <258baeb80710171430x43e4a319p18de1a21283d7088@mail.gmail.com> <471646D9.2020205@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-10-17 17:31, "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote: >allen paul wrote: >> Thank you, That was the peice of information I was looking for. >> Sure, I will respect proper credits, and skip copyrighted >> information. I might have been mistaken if I mistook BSD >> documentation as freely distributed information under GNU license. >> But, as long as I can post a few Kernel related excerpts, I think I >> am good. > > In general your going to find BSD a more permissive license then GPL > (for sure less viral). Contact me privately if you need a good > background references this as well other possible licensing options > you may have. ... or ask here, on the freebsd-questions mailing list. There is no reason why a discussion about the way the BSD license works would be kept `private' in personal mailboxes :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071018110727.GD1563>