Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:20:03 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> To: barney_cordoba@yahoo.com Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is there a protected/locked printf? Message-ID: <498F2253.9010204@andric.com> In-Reply-To: <426059.88012.qm@web63906.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <426059.88012.qm@web63906.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2009-02-08 18:31, Barney Cordoba wrote: > Its taking me all day to figure out something that should take 5 minutes > if I could get printf to not print garbage. Is there a mulitcore version > of printf that isn't completely useless for use for trace code? Add: options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=128 to your kernel config file, that might help.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?498F2253.9010204>