Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:29:46 -0600 (MDT) From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, marcel@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r184193 - in head/sys: arm/conf conf Message-ID: <20081023.202946.74666802.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <868wsewzos.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <200810230151.m9N1ptUe044619@svn.freebsd.org> <20081023.190942.74668946.imp@bsdimp.com> <868wsewzos.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> Subject: Re: svn commit: r184193 - in head/sys: arm/conf conf Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:26:43 +0200 > Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > > We already have a better mechanism for including config files. We > > should be using that instead of poluting another port with the > > DEFAULTS file. > = > Should we even have DEFAULTS files at all? IMHO they just confuse > matters by introducing "stealth" options into your config. No. It is a useful transition tool when things become required, it isn't a useful long-term resting place for options. IMHO. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081023.202946.74666802.imp>