Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:31:07 -0600
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>, Stephen Hurd <shurd@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, Ngie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r323516 - in head/sys: dev/bnxt dev/e1000 kern net sys
Message-ID:  <1EBD0641-002D-409C-B18E-AAB5FCDECEBA@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <48654d1f-4cc7-da05-7a73-ef538b431560@freebsd.org>
References:  <201709130711.v8D7BlTS003204@slippy.cwsent.com> <48654d1f-4cc7-da05-7a73-ef538b431560@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
>>>> #blamebruno
>>>>=20
>>>> Reviewed by:    sbruno
>>>> Approved by:    sbruno (mentor)
>>>> Sponsored by:    Limelight Networks
>>>> Differential Revision:    https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12235
>>>=20
>>> *gasps at the LoC count and number of changed drivers*
>>>=20
>>> Could someone please better break this up in the future..?
>>=20
>> Agreed. Down the road parsing out individual commits in this jumbo =
commit=20
>> will be difficult to parse. IMO this may as well have simply been, =
import=20
>> from https://github.com/mattmacy/networking/, just like Mr. Torvalds =
does=20
>> at kernel.org. I expect to see a commit like this there but not here. =
Can=20
>> we break this down to its functional commits?
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> This ridiculous loc was due to the amount of restructuring needed to =
get
> us back to being in sync with our development.  The future will not =
have
> this big of a commit/change and should be more bite/fun sized.
>=20
> The #blamebruno tag in the commit log was to indicate that this was =
not
> something Stephen was doing on his own, but was something that I had
> induced over the last few months during testing.
>=20

This breaks my system.  I prior to this commit, I had igb0 and igb1.  =
Now I
only have igb0, and it=E2=80=99s like igb1 isn=E2=80=99t even trying to =
attach.  Unfortunately,
this breaks my nfsroot setup, so I need to roll back my tree.  Please =
let me
know if there=E2=80=99s anything I can provide to help debugging.

Scott





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1EBD0641-002D-409C-B18E-AAB5FCDECEBA>