Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 21:22:07 +0100 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/gcc41 - libjava Message-ID: <4419C8EF.5050907@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0603162051300.7310@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <4418A188.8060200@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0603162051300.7310@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2FE09939C5755D0C23FFAB5A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Actually I have tested this with 256Mb, 1024Mb and 1280Mb ram. The results were the same. That -i works would in my opinion imply that the problem is not with gmake itself, but with a shell command issued by gmake. It's nice to hear that work on this is being done. Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Today I removed the lines >> # FIXME: As of 20051202, installing libgcj nearly kills 1GB machines. >> WITHOUT_JAVA=3D yes >> >> from the ports Makefile. The previous version of the Port gave me >> "virtual memory exhausted" messages, even with 800MB of free memory >> available. However this time a >> >> # make makesum build >> >> Ran through without troubles. >> >> A "make install" gave me the message again, but forcing an installatio= n >> with "make -i install" seems to work. I only compiled a small "Hello >> World!", but that is better than nothing, I guess. >=20 > Thanks for this input! The problem I see is that "make -i" will not on= ly=20 > ignore out-of-memory conditions but *any* errors occuring. >=20 > Given that we generally test updates before releasing to our users we=20 > might get away with that, but these builds will not be reproducible:=20 > depending on the memory in her build machine, a user will get different= =20 > results, some of which may match your positive experience, some of whic= h > may not. >=20 > As an alternate approach, Maho-san and me are currently discussing to u= se > the new gmake-devel port which has fixes to address the situation on th= e > gmake side for the time being. >=20 > Gerald --------------enig2FE09939C5755D0C23FFAB5A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEGcjvfMDIb41/+S0RAoXcAJ9Ce35OMtk0le/4Y7DHt13IuRsEkQCggnS2 t44lCmMsyEF2XML1yx8Ewek= =rPch -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2FE09939C5755D0C23FFAB5A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4419C8EF.5050907>