Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 08:22:15 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> To: stanb@netcom.com (Stan Brown) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sys Admin article on Linux emulation Message-ID: <199912201322.IAA44500@blackhelicopters.org> In-Reply-To: <199912181557.HAA22996@netcom.com> from Stan Brown at "Dec 18, 1999 10:57: 0 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This months _Sy Admin_ magazine has a nice aritcle on Linux emulation > under FreeBSD. > > The author says he is running CURRENT> He rcomends several options to > be set in ones kernel config file. Are these option appropriate for a > machine runing STABLE? Uh, as the outhor, I *hope* I didn't say I'm running -current... if I did, it is a definite error and I should be taken out and shot. Those options are appropriate for stable. BTW, in the future, it would be a good idea to include the options in question in a query to the mailing list. You aren't always going to have someone on hand who has read the same third-party article you have, even when it's on the Web. Any if anyone still cares, the mysterious options are: options "P1003_1B" #POSIX infrastructure options "_KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING" #Built-in POSIX priority scheduling options "_KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L" #POSIX version kernel is built for options SYSVSHM #System V shared memory options SYSVMSG #System V semaphores options SYSVSEM #System V messaging options USER_LDT #allow user-level control of i386 ldt My only complaint is the positioning of Tux and Beastie in the picture; if they had been reversed, the damn penguin would be getting a beakful of pitchfork. ;) Glad you liked it. ==ml To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912201322.IAA44500>