Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 14:12:14 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Mark Newton <newton@internode.com.au> Cc: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@acl.lanl.gov>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Filesystem question... Message-ID: <379A9CAE.F697F68C@newsguy.com> References: <199907250237.MAA21069@gizmo.internode.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Newton wrote: > > > But thanks for the note. I just now realized that if I add a private name > > space to v9fs (which is easy), and then turn on user mounts, user > > processes can have private name spaces on freebsd! > > I can't wait to see the security problems that causes when setuid executables > assume that they only need to be worrying about one filesystem namespace. > :-) Yeah... it would be interesting to have a user-fs in which all executables where automatically chown to root, and setuid. :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Your usefulness to my realm ended the day you made it off Hustaing alive." -- Sun Tzu Liao to his ex-finacee, Isis Marik To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?379A9CAE.F697F68C>