Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:27:57 -0600 (CST) From: "Scott A. Moberly" <smoberly@karamazov.org> To: <hartzell@kestrel.alerce.com> Cc: <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: NFS mounting the ports tree. Message-ID: <45077.65.221.169.187.1039127277.squirrel@mail.karamazov.org> In-Reply-To: <15855.52973.469760.370106@rosebud.alerce.com> References: <15855.50834.811514.388015@rosebud.alerce.com> <38311.65.221.169.187.1039125234.squirrel@mail.karamazov.org> <15855.52973.469760.370106@rosebud.alerce.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Scott A. Moberly writes: > > [...] > > > George originally wrote: > > > > > > 1) I found the section of the freebsd handbook that explains how > to > > > set up the distfiles directory and the workdirectory. This > still seems to require that the client actually build the > thing, > > > which is what I'm trying to avoid. > > > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/small-lan.html) > > > > You can do it, but... /etc/make.conf would have to be generic, use > includes based on hostname(1) or manually (script) move > > /etc/make.`hostname` around... > > I'm happy having make.conf be generic, I don't *think* that's the > cause of my difficulties. > > > > 2) I've tried just mounting /usr/ports, cd'ing into the directory > of > > > interest, and doing a "make install". This fails quickly, > since > > > the INSTALLCOOKIE is there. > > > > > > Doing a "make deinstall" then a "make install" works for > simple > > > ports, but sometimes causes recompilation. > > > > make clean is a quicker alternative > > Doesn't a make clean remove all of the stuff that's built? How is that > quicker than installing what the big beefy machine has already compiled? I see what you are doing is a make install onto the 'beefy' machine then a make install onto the the slower ones. then just: rm -f work/.install_done* should work fastest. > > [...] > > have /var/db/pkg a temporary mount for building installing. > > Again, I'm confused. I'm hoping to avoid all of the recompiles? on fast machine: mount_nfs slow_machine:/var/db/pkg /var/db/pkg cd /usr/ports/type/package make clean && make umount /var/db/pkg on slow machine: mount_nfs fast_machine:/usr/ports /usr/ports cd /usr/ports/type/package make install umount /usr/ports > > [...] > > I personally just mount and let the client build after I have tested > and reviewed said port. > > In my case, my laptop would spend the weekend rebuilding gnome, > evolution, X, perl, etc.... Yikes. Understood... hope the above helps... on the one intolerably slow machine I had, the above procedure worked and as the machine died; I no longer have the scripts around. Of course, when it comes to dependencies things need to be scripted. The above commands become very tedious when re-building an entire system bottom-up. I think I used perl and ssh, but again the script is lost, so I can't just hand you a solution :( my apologies. -- Scott A. Moberly smoberly@karamazov.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45077.65.221.169.187.1039127277.squirrel>