Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Apr 2019 22:22:56 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 236607] net/yggdrasil: Version 0.3.5
Message-ID:  <bug-236607-7788-MB3xoMBRgD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-236607-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-236607-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236607

--- Comment #4 from Neil Alexander <freebsd@neilalexander.dev> ---
Hi Dmitri

Thanks for the concise response. I'll make some changes and submit a new pa=
tch
soon.

I am a little confused about GH_TUPLE and vendoring. I was under the impres=
sion
that when module support is enabled in Go, vendoring directories are ignore=
d.

Is GH_TUPLE a replacement for the other GH_ variables and, if so, should it
really contain an entry for every other Go dependency? Is it not sufficient=
 to
let Go deal with the modules itself?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-236607-7788-MB3xoMBRgD>