Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:43:18 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: proposed next Bugathon Message-ID: <20080227194318.57791758.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080227221210.GB6275@soaustin.net> References: <20080227221210.GB6275@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:12:10 -0600 linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: > Now that we've made a lot of progress in evaluating the state of various > PRs in the database (from the last Bugathon and subsequent work), I think > the next Bugathon should be devoted to trying to getting some commits > done based on that. To do that, of course, we need some committers to > help us, but I think if we can show them a list of PRs that that will be > easier. > > Here are the suggestions I have: > > - PRs that are posted as "recommended for review by the bugbusting > team" > > - PRs in the 'patched' state awaiting MFCs to 7 and/or 6. > > - PRs that have been evaluated in the past month, as a result of the > last Bugathon. > > In addition I would also like to identify: > > - Any PRs in the 'open' state that really should be in the 'patched' > state. > > I'm not sure I will have the cycles in the next few days to write a > script to automatically flag these, but I will try. > > Also note that by this weekend, the ports tree should be completely > unfrozen, so there's probably a lot of low-hanging fruit there as well. > > So how does this sound to people? I have many PRs that now need MFC'ed so that their state may be changed from patched to closed. This may be the motivation I need ... -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080227194318.57791758.trhodes>