Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      	Tue, 12 Mar 1996 23:29:54 -0800 (PST)
From:      Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
To:        invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com>
Cc:        Thomas J Balfe <tbalfe@tioga.com>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: CA-95:14
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960312232617.15976B-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960312153623.9840C-100000@nervosa.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Tue, 12 Mar 1996, invalid opcode wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Mar 1996, Thomas J Balfe wrote:
> 
> > Does 2.1R have the RFC 1408 or RFC 1572 telnetd_environment_vulnerability 
> > bug worked out of it, or do I have to apply a patch? Are there any other 
> > things that I should apply to 2.1R? Thanks.
> > Thomas J Balfe
> 
> As far as I can tell (strings /usr/bin/telnet | grep -i LD), it doesn't 
> appear to be present.

  Read more carefully.  The specified problem is in telnetd, not telnet.  

  I can't speak for 2.1R, but the problem is not in -stable or -current.

Tom



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960312232617.15976B-100000>