Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 15:19:13 -0500 From: Joe Nosay <superbisquit@gmail.com> To: Xin LI <d@delphij.net> Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: UDP Lite support Message-ID: <CA%2BWntOs5k0P2q7QDe=Jpex-mpZd3Vwvfn0uT%2BZUrBvwkY0PFdA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53138FA6.1060705@delphij.net> References: <CA%2BWntOugdnjM1SvFcEtWb8=heQCOBs2-c97EUKsfEHSmi1HRSw@mail.gmail.com> <20140227021917.GE81440@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <CA%2BWntOuCc0R9B_r92o2dzB_%2BZvMssyD=pByn-aL=VapxjTkUMA@mail.gmail.com> <530EBCDB.1090303@delphij.net> <CA%2BWntOt2AEJVsVeVStHd_vJ6kqDxVgkeC8YA-pF2JnWLSRb7Eg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BWntOsUzNV5HPA2rOLPNDz4k7RE02HNt7onoqGXn9kzErNg%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <53138FA6.1060705@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> > >> wrote: > >> > > On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis > >>>>> <brooks@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been > >>>>>>> reconsidered or is the likelihood of too many damaged > >>>>>>> packets the reason for not supporting? I'm not sure > >>>>>>> where to put this question. Apologies for the noise. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You've provided next to no context. What is the > >>>>>> question? What thread are you referring to? If this is > >>>>>> the usual UDP then freebsd-net would be vastly more > >>>>>> appropriate than -current. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- Brooks > >>>>>> > >>>>> Thanks. I will ask kevlo and maybe bring it up on > >>>>> freebsd-net. It has to do with an implementation of the > >>>>> JACK server using UDP Lite for transferring data. > >>>>> > >>>>> > > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/UDP-lite-for-FreeBSD-td4010236.html > > > > Looks > >>>>> > > like nobody proposed a patch? > > > > I think the concern was that this is not very useful in real-world > > scenarios due to link layer error detection mechanism but that > > doesn't raise a red flag to me assuming this is sufficiently self > > contained feature as it would improve compatibility with other > > operating systems. > > > > Cheers, > >>> > >> > >> https://github.com/torelizer/jack_trauma > >> > >> Not my project; but, I want to port it to FreeBSD. First is to > >> get it to build from source. Use your raspberry pi with FreeBSD > >> to broadcast your tunes and all. > >> > > > > > > Thanks for all of the input. The project is being reworked to > > improve the code. > > Kevin Lo have a patchset but needs someone to do performance testing > (its impact on non-UDPLite applications), test with vimage, etc: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udplite.diff > http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udp-v.diff > > Are you interested in working on these and report back? > > Cheers, > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTE4+mAAoJEJW2GBstM+nsthoQAIW67l7yDfIPvxDsNIWWJcRd > 8brFYCAOPYE4LpuLGjtSgy370aBe9JmwAm41tE4qF0WhGpcu6TLsKjgMGWa/lHCc > JId8+WBfbbQT8XJj/d+3oOETn5/rglvlRhJbnNIwaQpTXxuMC5oz2nGW7rIpIkaA > OHo0D20DzGj4nxrQvijZ7DsMkk3F+KJu/4p7M6lpsIPCakknW1WD7IHRfbZ4Oldz > 2xH4HfIk7cAdA7i/YUNjlpSgWFQ5OU03J5HAYfC6W37wiGbjdBYf/PKVhJ8hz7+D > OCl+yCV00u4fCjlY6zXFea9pGr7Cl1P+sapwKDZ4g+NpNHxBUVY+ahbjQUHYON2W > sdzAsLpMMqavCr1o8mcXdm7IPRlLUK9QZUySC9DitPvoF8G2llTAz1mWa4/Oj7/S > JMiUERcaL5gdFN8EgEKkamFgLJguYquAjGtiowa51EMbnZG0Q2yWUcrEBFHWBEZT > RW1u6r4ChIrPE9X5ljfFpQyKG6jFhYFXG+iVlgTB7F2ZWhjPAXi/tLbBnvIcci1m > Md4XFm/bBJj/yNXdPuCi+CtvvdpZ/d4LQn4B7By5bIo1QjCb4Zx5n2Tq5xnYZUOI > CnSVnNSkwLbbrAVtYOVWnrSuwR33JQnqeGHdM+XYBBwKBRhrx+ZgFWD7N6Gm95PU > xXSxkgYVXI4sgi7Lh3Ia > =2Vmc > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > I have on patch file that Lo sent. Three different files are on it with the assumption that the patch-root is /usr/src. I'm thinking about snipping it twice and then applying each subpatch within the proper subdirectory. Now, this would not when Index:reference is at the header of each, right?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BWntOs5k0P2q7QDe=Jpex-mpZd3Vwvfn0uT%2BZUrBvwkY0PFdA>