Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:52:32 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why 100 packages are evil Message-ID: <571BB660.1070107@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <34743.1461428396@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <E1asbZj-0003Ra-Qs@rmm6prod02.runbox.com> <76093.1461096570@critter.freebsd.dk> <5716AD65.8070007@shrew.net> <BF66EA01-E073-45F0-8F9E-22D57E8871B0@bsdimp.com> <5716FA70.4080604@freebsd.org> <57170E5D.1090701@freebsd.org> <5524F499-5042-407E-9180-43D15A53F3F0@FreeBSD.org> <7621BDAB-A409-456A-A3F1-A6CD9B371DBC@rdsor.ro> <20160420094806.GJ6614@zxy.spb.ru> <7c84f388-21dc-419f-70ce-c5369e294dab@freebsd.org> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1604222009300.15755@minnie.bitsea.ca> <34743.1461428396@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --U29wnsO23bwwAtcfg6RNSTwaMK79xf9mm Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Xkr3av7KLsAxlsvOiinGNOFTdAoTH0aof" From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <571BB660.1070107@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: why 100 packages are evil References: <E1asbZj-0003Ra-Qs@rmm6prod02.runbox.com> <76093.1461096570@critter.freebsd.dk> <5716AD65.8070007@shrew.net> <BF66EA01-E073-45F0-8F9E-22D57E8871B0@bsdimp.com> <5716FA70.4080604@freebsd.org> <57170E5D.1090701@freebsd.org> <5524F499-5042-407E-9180-43D15A53F3F0@FreeBSD.org> <7621BDAB-A409-456A-A3F1-A6CD9B371DBC@rdsor.ro> <20160420094806.GJ6614@zxy.spb.ru> <7c84f388-21dc-419f-70ce-c5369e294dab@freebsd.org> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1604222009300.15755@minnie.bitsea.ca> <34743.1461428396@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <34743.1461428396@critter.freebsd.dk> --Xkr3av7KLsAxlsvOiinGNOFTdAoTH0aof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23/04/2016 17:19, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > In message <alpine.OSX.2.00.1604222009300.15755@minnie.bitsea.ca>, Lynd= on Neren > berg writes: >=20 >> With freebsd-update, an announcement comes out that says 'update'!. S= o we=20 >> do. Move from 10.2-p11 to 10.2-p12. There is a very clear track reco= rd=20 >> of why and how this happened. >=20 > Is freebsd-update going away as result of the new packaging ? Yes. It will be replaced by 'pkg upgrade' -- as far as I know, that's the plan for 11.0-RELEASE. I have no idea if anyone intends to run maintain freebsd-update in parallel for a transition period, but freebsd-update will ultimately be superceded. Cheers, Matthew --Xkr3av7KLsAxlsvOiinGNOFTdAoTH0aof-- --U29wnsO23bwwAtcfg6RNSTwaMK79xf9mm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXG7ZgXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATm/cP/iNAXr4TnW3KP3aYsAlZMU8P w3Wis9Bs4zLqc9SpsfeLe0Hi3fNrSPTI9WMD0qKkzXNrXdD+gkxsQARUklGwHtUC d7tJWOGltRxldcWMVZ1Zspnc4EOFykmo/5ScOAlEXQkVRzfdjj4Sr8j0bsbMQ54d sHI1OUDJ9gsBuNaU73XVU+it01HyDFZoCzW7tnr7KVgdzKDkdtAykwI4MW9Ao3bY LOYYGSw0i2BVVWH8tWsKWLk4FvMP/WISHMCJqC8lnQ4mVMh9FF1c03Dya6Y6MpPp 20t+I7V5BPo857Zyk25DUuD0OtvHmRCG9QORpvo7cPnCRY/7fIzcdeod11aYD2kk u9kK+Uc711lxKG79JCDLhGz8wcTv4CumlORHbERvx1Sz42Ec/2mZNASzyJRcr/yp cCSE7st+hKgco4gXGbX1ogF22qmvURQVDDMPkXwjwKDRCQaAE9F+cB1pDQ1jhzmJ +9FgSSU8WoE6Tdlcmo8YgDmu92VzSmy7c278JVbNfcmce73mC8Za9lPteL/zG9Kz O8E3AnHhhQ71kwVR3kc6iUPj68TOP3/lTz+xnloZ85Zfkowu5rCDsD0Lmtqs2lkT 5+V495cxX9idIl79fDFhrupzmp0St6ApARmzTBRVloHTm4xdILTvZRiYk22heN/E IBiu8/2sjP/rSW1wjr80 =RoQ0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --U29wnsO23bwwAtcfg6RNSTwaMK79xf9mm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?571BB660.1070107>