Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:54:55 +0100
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: final decision about *at syscalls
Message-ID:  <20071227155455.GA23604@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200712201138.56423.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <20071218092222.GA9695@freebsd.org> <200712201138.56423.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Considering Robert's paper on security race problems in things like systrace
> stemming from when you copy parameters out of userland and into the kernel
> multiple times, I think #2 is definitely the better choice.  Also, namei() is
> already thread aware AFAICT since 'struct componentname' already contains a
> 'cnp_thread' member (was 'cnp_proc' in 4.x).

two strong voices for #2, I am going that way...

thnx



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071227155455.GA23604>