Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:13:54 +0000
From:      Matthew Seaman <>
Subject:   Re: Clang - what is the story?
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 21/01/2012 17:47, Raimund Steger wrote:
> On 01/21/12 14:35, RW wrote:
>> [...]
>> It is that. I don't know the details, but GPLv3 is sufficiently more
>> viral that recent gcc versions can't be used as the base system
>> compiler. We're currently stuck with a version from 2007.
> Sorry if this has been asked before, but it makes me wonder, what are
> the plans for SPARC and PowerPC?

PowerPC is apparently supported by clang, so ultimately it should just
switch over like i386 and amd64.

Clang doesn't compile on sparc64 at the moment.  I assume this is just a
temporary state of affairs and sparc64 support will be forthcoming
eventually.  Until then sparc64 will have to make do with the current
gcc in base.



Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP:     Ramsgate
JID:               Kent, CT11 9PW

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>