Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:10:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Bryan Liesner <bleez@comcast.net> To: Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org> Cc: Bryan Liesner <bleez@comcast.net> Subject: Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt Message-ID: <20030921140228.V498@gravy.homeunix.net> In-Reply-To: <20030921163553.GA19729@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <200309200755.h8K7t4fA049614@spider.deepcore.dk> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309201447120.18207-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20030920192850.Y458@gravy.homeunix.net> <20030921163553.GA19729@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote: > Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner =E9crivait : > > > The patch doesn't take care of the hang for me. > > Does it change anything, or do you still see the 'REQUEST_SENSE > recovered from missing interrupt'? Is your source tree up-to-date? > Several fixes have been committed to both the ATA and the CAM subsystems > recently, that address problems uncovered by the transition to ATAng. > > > Did anyone read _any_ of my previous posts? > > Certainly so, since you already received answers to some of them. Thanks, the hang problems are fixed now. In an earlier post, I pointed out the commit that seemed to break things. Immediately after a commit to ata-queue.c, the hangs started. I was incorrectly thinking that this commit caused the problem, instead of uncovering a problem that was hiding somewhere else. No one told me that I was barking up the wrong tree... -Bryan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030921140228.V498>