Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:59:16 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.ORG>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: savcore dump names? Message-ID: <3CD1E0E4.86406459@mindspring.com> References: <20020503002436.98DA538FD@overcee.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm wrote: > "Andrew R. Reiter" wrote: > > On Thu, 2 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > > :I was doing this: 8^p. > > > > Damn, then why post at all? That's crap. > > Agreed. We have better things to do than sort through intentionally bogus > email. So, just to recap and document for posterity: o Directly complaining about Poul, and doing nothing to change the code, other than trying to browbeat Poul into it: o Good o Inside the list charter o Indirectly complaining about people complaining about Poul by documenting how to trivially undo what Poul did, and thus implicitly suggesting backing out "undesirable changes" instead of simply bitching about them: o Bogus o Outside the list charter Correct? I frequently disagree with Poul's methods and design decisions, but that's no reason for personal attacks, or I'd be posting them myself. --- So... Can I ask AGAIN that the people who have a problem with the MD5 changes PLEASE describe acceptable-to-them savecore(8) behaviour, other than just saying "put it back"? Saying "the way it was" is not a design specification. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CD1E0E4.86406459>