Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 11:49:21 -0800 From: "Craig Caughlin" <craigcaughlin@comcast.net> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Boot manager clarification Message-ID: <000001c3b1fa$e3dd3010$0101a8c0@p4>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi folks, I have 2 hard disks, each on their own channel. I have XOSL installed as = my boot manager, in Drive 1, Partition 1. I have Windows 2000-Pro on Drive = 1, Partition 2. I want to install FreeBSD 5.0 on Drive 2, but use XOSL to = load it.=20 Should I install FreeBSD using the "Standard" MBR option, or should I = use the "BootMgr" option? I *think* I would want to use the standard, = because it seems like the BootMgr option would install in the MBR of Disk 1 and NOT Disk 2, thereby goofing up XOSL (which is what I'm trying to avoid!). Thank you, Craig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001c3b1fa$e3dd3010$0101a8c0>