Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 11:17:13 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: David Greenman-Lawrence <dg@root.com> Cc: jamie@tridentmicrosystems.co.uk, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broadcom BCM5701 Chipset problems Message-ID: <3CE00329.AD179FC9@mindspring.com> References: <20020513115600.A50967@mufuf.trident-uk.co.uk> <3CDFF60C.48A2EA65@mindspring.com> <20020513102526.H72322@nexus.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Greenman-Lawrence wrote: > >If you aren't using VLAN tagging, you shouldn't care. > > No, that is absolutely not correct. The checksum problems happend in many > situations, depending on the chipset and other factors. The problem that > resulted in the commit to disable the receive hardware checksum was caused > by small packets with certain byte patterns, NOT VLAN ENCAPSULATION. Are you sure you are talking about the Tigon III, and not the Tigon II? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CE00329.AD179FC9>