Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 May 2005 14:21:02 +0200
From:      Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org>
To:        Thomas Vogt <freebsdlists@bsdunix.ch>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is the "tcp time stamp validation issue" fixed in 5.4?
Message-ID:  <20050520122102.GA1065@unixpages.org>
In-Reply-To: <1116571610.54493.41.camel@bert.mlan.solnet.ch>
References:  <1116571610.54493.41.camel@bert.mlan.solnet.ch>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:46:50AM +0200, Thomas Vogt wrote:
> Hello
>=20
> I'm a bit confused about the "tcp time stamp validation bug" mentioned
> in the http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/637934 advisory. FreeBSD has fixed
> this issue in -current (2005-04-10) and in RELENG_5 (2005-04-19).=20
>=20
> Is this also already fixed in 5.4? The CVS ID for tcp_input.c does not
> look like this. But I'm not sure.
>=20

Unfortunately the fix wasn't merged back to RELENG_5_4 during the
release process.  I have written a mail to the security team (see thread
on net@), hopefully they will merge this back soon.

- Christian

--=20
Christian Brueffer	chris@unixpages.org	brueffer@FreeBSD.org
GPG Key:	 http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B  B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D

--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCjdYubHYXjKDtmC0RAhlMAKDGYOiyHB8FtYdeewFLesBCIJenVQCg/BME
HR12SDvBnJZfh8ntF3jFpJI=
=2ezG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050520122102.GA1065>