Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:17:44 -0600
From:      Justin Hibbits <jhibbits@freebsd.org>
To:        kevans@freebsd.org
Cc:        src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,  svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r339516 - head/sys/cddl/dev/dtrace/powerpc
Message-ID:  <CAHSQbTCN8MEsCqq9Bm3w1FcpF8FVCf8EE1V5ATEL%2Bz8pCqOSsQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaENKZJmTxR6sBWU%2BB5LBYgQbg0gP%2BoQq9CtRXbYfqkGhQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201810210208.w9L28vVc080088@repo.freebsd.org> <CACNAnaEAGCnrtxyug=FGFneyM6VnAyzNr6Eb5ZDza-z525FRiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACNAnaENKZJmTxR6sBWU%2BB5LBYgQbg0gP%2BoQq9CtRXbYfqkGhQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:02 PM Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 9:42 PM Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 9:09 PM Justin Hibbits <jhibbits@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Author: jhibbits
> > > Date: Sun Oct 21 02:08:57 2018
> > > New Revision: 339516
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339516
> > >
> > > Log:
> > >   powerpc/dtrace: Use explicit bit numbers to mask out PSL_EE
> > >
> > >   There seems to be a race in CI, such that dtrace_asm.S might be assembled
> > >   before the genassym is completed.  This causes a build failure when PSL_EE
> > >   doesn't exist, and is read as 0.  Get around this by explicitly specifying
> > >   the bits in the mask instead.
> > >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > CI on the stable/12 branch still hits this, so I'm tempted to MFC this
> > if you don't object. OTOH, the correct solution should be a
> > `dependency "genassym.o"` in ^/sys/conf/files.powerpc for
> > dtrace_asm.S, no?
> >
>
> Sorry, that should have read "genassym.inc" -- my naive understanding
> of 'dependency' is that config(8) will turn it directly into a
> makefile dependency that will alleviate this.

Hm, I'm surprised we don't have a rule for all kernel .S files, even
modules, being dependent on that.  Should we add one?

- Justin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHSQbTCN8MEsCqq9Bm3w1FcpF8FVCf8EE1V5ATEL%2Bz8pCqOSsQ>