Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:56:20 +0200
From:      Nicola Vitale <nivit@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/wbar Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/x11/wbar/files patch-Makefile patch-configure pkg-message.in
Message-ID:  <CAEQKd7VTgdZsUpAGT78UGX5dJ%2BCc_Fhy7w21pWcNZJZb9kjaEw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110705164319.GA46561@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201106301334.p5UDYYZ0059582@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110705164319.GA46561@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

> [2011/7/5 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>]
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:34:34PM +0000, Nicola Vitale wrote:
>> =A0 - Add sysutils/pidof to RUN_DEPENDS
>
> Perhaps port can be patched to use pgrep(1) which is in the base, instead
> of sysutils/pidof rdep?

Yes, of course, but I would prefer to wait the decision of the author:
http://goo.gl/zCaS5
Moreover, in my opinion, there are not advantages in terms of
performance, and the package of pidof is about 4293 bytes after all.

--=20
Nicola Vitale



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEQKd7VTgdZsUpAGT78UGX5dJ%2BCc_Fhy7w21pWcNZJZb9kjaEw>