Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 13:20:51 -0500 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>, Scott Dodson <sdodson@eagle4.cc.gasou.edu> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: rebuild Message-ID: <oprpm081fr8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <1053702799.313.0.camel@gyros> References: <E19J0kS-000G8y-L6@ran.psg.com> <1053652345.14171.2.camel@localhost> <1053702799.313.0.camel@gyros>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 May 2003 11:13:20 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 21:12, Scott Dodson wrote: >> On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 00:55, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > > >> (05.22.2003 @ 1749 PST): Randy Bush said, in 0.3K: << >> > > new install acting pretty sick, no panel, verrrrrrry slow, ... >> > > > > what do i portupgrade to force rebuild of the whole puppy? >> > > > > thanks. >> > > > > randy >> > >> end of "rebuild" from Randy Bush << >> > > portupgrade -r xft >> >> This brings up an interesting question. marcusmerge tells us to do >> portugrade -r pkgconfig. I'm wondering if any of these are particularly >> different? Wouldn't portupgrade -R gnome2 work as well? I've never had >> problems with any of the different methods. I'm just wondering if one >> is particularly useful in a certain situation over another, etc. > > Just like Perl, "There's more than one way to do it." I usually run > portupgrade -ra after running marcusmerge. I'm funny that way. You aren't only one, I always run 'pkgdb -F' then 'portupgrade -ra' at the everything. It's very very rarely to fail on me, which only one time was xft.. Cheers, Mezz > Joe > >> >> -- >> Scott -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?oprpm081fr8ckrg5>