Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:10:40 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrey Zonov <zont@FreeBSD.org>, Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] unprivileged mlock(2) Message-ID: <50463610.6070805@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <503F476E.1010505@FreeBSD.org> References: <503DD433.2030108@FreeBSD.org> <201208290906.q7T96C9j032802@gw.catspoiler.org> <20120829092318.GW33100@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <503F2D24.8050103@FreeBSD.org> <503F476E.1010505@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 30/08/2012 13:58 Andrey Zonov said the following: > [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~zont/vm_mmap.c.patch This patch is correct. > [2] http://people.freebsd.org/~zont/racct.patch This patch looks correct. And it also makes me wonder why kern/kern_racct.c is marked as standard while all(?) uses of racct API are placed under RACCT option. Ditto for kern_rctl.c/RCTL. I think that excluding these file if the options are not used would help to catch cases where the API is used unconditionally and it would also help to reduce kernel sizes a tiny bit too. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50463610.6070805>