Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:54:18 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Subject: Re: Why not use normal CONFLICTS in lang/gcc43 instead of custom? Message-ID: <4A375DBA.4010305@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.99.0906160709360.29901@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <op.uvgzawdm9aq2h7@localhost> <alpine.LSU.1.99.0906160709360.29901@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Using the full path will not work too well either with different LOCALBASEs
> though I guess one could check /usr/local, $PREFIX, and $LOCALBASE and
> consider that good enough.
I think ${LOCALBASE}/bin/gcc295 would be enough. As you say, gcc295 is
dying, while ccache is actively used. It's quite annoying to remove such
check from the Makefile, while I doubt anyone is still going to compile
gcc43 with gcc295 installed in a non-standard location.
--
Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A375DBA.4010305>