Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Nov 2000 19:59:38 +0100 (CET)
From:      Heiko Recktenwald <uzs106@ibm.rhrz.uni-bonn.de>
To:        Tim Pozar <pozar@lns.com>
Cc:        torstenb@vmunix.org, Thomas Runge <runge@rostock.zgdv.de>, freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RTP vs. HTTP as streaming protocol, SMIL
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011101955090.1512-100000@moritz.alleswirdgelber>
In-Reply-To: <20001109132515.A95823@lns.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Chicken and the egg.  ISPs need to deploy it.  Customers will then
> ask for it.  They don't feel your pain.
> 
> As for the amount of time it takes to learn and maintain an
> MCAST/MBONE link... I have been connected since '96 and it is pretty
> easy to set up (mrouted or other methods) and maintain.  Admititly
> there is a reliability problem as the MBONE is a bit lossy and it
> does go up and down.  Players like Realplayer can be set up to try
> multicast and then fall back to unicast so outages are less of a
> problem.

Dont know much about mbone. On a larger scale. But from what I have read,
its a multitude of apps, maybe some crying for their MIME type ;-), that
must be mixed into a concept. One thing that came to mind was
teleconferencing and decision making. How can you make decisions, that are
legaly binding ? On a share holders conference or whatever.

I think shareholders conferences are a big thing in the moment.

H.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0011101955090.1512-100000>