Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:36:19 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! Message-ID: <20060910023619.GA32206@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20060909231448.E1031@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200609100159.k8A1xAIn089481@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20060909231448.E1031@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was > that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed > stable ... http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/version-guide/decision-points.html > but "blantant and obvious bugs due to insufficient testing", IMHO, doesn't > classify as an 'oops' .... You've already made this point -- 3 times. What would you like us to do now, punish the committer? Simply reiterating your criticism and unhappiness isn't going to do anything to fix this problem (for which, of course, a fix has already been made), or the next one(s) either. It was an error, it's been fixed, may I suggest we move on to the next bug? mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060910023619.GA32206>