Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 20:50:37 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC... Message-ID: <37A3B5FD.78733187@softweyr.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907301619280.6951-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Brian F. Feldman" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> >
> > In that case, my argument changes to:
> > "There's no good reason not to have bpf in the GENERIC kernel."
>
> And how about having
> if (securelevel > 3)
> return (EPERM);
> in bpf_open()?
I like this. Nice one, Greenie! ;^)
Now stop replying to yourself, it's too much like...
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://softweyr.com/ wes@softweyr.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37A3B5FD.78733187>