Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:30:31 -0700
From:      Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option
Message-ID:  <1327944631.1686.24.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
In-Reply-To: <4F26CC5A.2070501@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4F26CC5A.2070501@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:59 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> 
> o hw.ata.ata_dma, hw.ata.atapi_dma - I am not sure if there have been any
> significant problems with ATA DMA recently.  Maybe these could be removed?

I still have to work with hardware that requires ata_dma disabled.  It
seems to be required for most systems I've worked with that have a
compact flash socket on the mainboard (sometimes you can just limit the
mode to udma33 or less, sometimes you have to turn it off completely.)

Adding kern.eventtimer.periodic=1 seems like a good idea.

As a general philosophical thing, I don't have a problem with the idea
"safe mode turns off everything that has ever historically been
problematic," because I don't think anyone expects a system to run well
in safe mode.  I see it more as a tool to start narrowing down the area
of trouble, like step 1 of a binary search for the problem.  As such,
the most important aspect is a comprehensive list of what changes for
safe mode, so that you can procede by selectively en/disabling the
various things it does.

-- Ian





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1327944631.1686.24.camel>