Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:33:36 -0700 (MST) From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@freebie.dcfinc.com> To: jdn@acp.qiv.com (Jay Nelson) Cc: witr@rwwa.com, mvh@netcom.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'Code Freeze' Message-ID: <199803192133.OAA25188@freebie.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980318221246.1621A-100000@acp.qiv.com> from Jay Nelson at "Mar 18, 98 11:03:45 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Let me add my paltry two bits in concurrance. From what I've seen. > 2.1.7 is _stable_ though ignored. 2.2.X seems to be current and 3.0, > or whatever is beyond, seems to be a work in progress. Truth is, 2.1.7 > does everything I need done. If I had to make a choice of versions to > put into a demanding environment for which I had to take > responsibility, it would be 2.1.7. We have all of our production machines at either 2.1.7 or 2.1-stable. I haven't seen enough improved functionality in the 2.2 stream to get me to change. I do sometimes covet the larger port/package list, however. But you're right. Unless what you're doing is UNIX hacking, it takes a compelling reason to change a working box. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL22) Brother, can you paradigm? 602-953-1392 chad@dcfinc.com chad@anasazi.com larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803192133.OAA25188>