Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 16:35:13 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r422981 - in head/dns: bind9-devel bind910 bind911 bind99 Message-ID: <20161004143513.d6akxn2h4fcann5n@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <611d5e17-7fe2-8a4e-ef21-1accab75c438@FreeBSD.org> References: <201609301244.u8UCiSSh043206@repo.freebsd.org> <d670864a-d31d-91a3-33ec-e3a58d30605d@marino.st> <be8e7cfd-3ee3-1629-d54a-6e0d00dd1ca8@FreeBSD.org> <383dbd77-15a0-ea2b-e909-e24d849e80f7@marino.st> <bfc32583-b0bb-0575-316e-8cccbb5c41e7@FreeBSD.org> <6a63b844-f762-c885-0dfd-21ff327abce8@marino.st> <c56a9708-4d00-82ab-cfe8-522e9981a57f@FreeBSD.org> <f1653adc-8420-679b-328b-94c61f0d05cc@marino.st> <611d5e17-7fe2-8a4e-ef21-1accab75c438@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fysxmgfym2tm5b3u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 04:27:20PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 04/10/2016 =E0 16:22, John Marino a =E9crit : > > On 10/4/2016 09:18, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> Le 04/10/2016 =E0 16:16, John Marino a =E9crit : > >>> On 10/4/2016 09:13, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >>>> Le 04/10/2016 =E0 16:04, John Marino a =E9crit : > >>>>> We build under a very heavy load which flushes out marginally unsafe > >>>>> ports. > >>>> > >>>> Ok, so make(1) from dragonfly has the same bug make(1) from FreeBSD 9 > >>>> has, feel free to fix it in dragonfly's port tree. > >>> > >>> master has bmake 20160818 on it (for last 5 weeks) > >>> Release 4.6 has bmake 20141111. > >>> Do you know if make bug only applies to master? > >> > >> I have no idea. I was told the problem was with make(1) on FreeBSD 9, > >> which seemed to be right, as it does not fail at all on FreeBSD 10/11 > >> with -j 2-10. > > > > The -j number is not the only factor here. I've seen ports pass under > > very high -j numbers but start failing when the server gets loaded. > > > > DragonFly has the lastest bmake, modern binutils, modern gcc and it > > doesn't have fmake (what freebsd 9 uses). > > > > Why is it so critical to classify bind910 as jobs safe when there > > clearly is a question about it? Let's not immediately assume DF is at > > fault here. As I mentioned before, it could easily be the build tests > > you're doing aren't sufficient to flush this out. It *was* marked > > UNSAFE before, obviously with good reason. (albeit undocumented) >=20 > It works just fine on all supported FreeBSD versions as it is, like I > said, feel free to change it in dragonfly's ports tree. >=20 No it does not see my reply I have reproduced at least 2 times on make -j40. It is not 100% reproducible but happen from time to time. Best regards, Bapt --fysxmgfym2tm5b3u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX8738AAoJEGOJi9zxtz5awQQP/icY3cv9NOHgX1n7TeK2PLxd d3HYVafDs5oXGYodck7ekWkj+YwS6KsWPbQZo/0FLcyk4yzrKtMpw+mUHAVb9hK/ UPTOftECKkTz1hOQAy9GFcN6KA2D2RD5HBhJXdWXCHq/eC6MsxA+ns7GGrsW2c4B b6EpY+BIlAwaFH0LKzE9zM2wlEa3clJOe6FrHE5nbhk5GKn5vK1JhDn9Uc7J5f9B YWY81L4vmEmY2Ku1sbaWygCsjjRu3ExC03kqJBD+ywoqVWYEebsDqBd/QKg7wfb4 FJlwi3CKFuLrNdjGlTCJ32hhtBlW4ElnLUUgUy6+577dW3z3Jm5bwoTLCJZYIZ2I iNd1tlhJN6wcTrSTkAJOvvYX/W/lUVsBkUDdu5sAE1GZYGHN05KxLI9suXGjrLDR Pb2pLV0tv5ULVCVVDH4ypyEPYN6/Vmx/3uAAHtoobwD4BvOn3HFDrcJ48j85QrZ6 ppg7LlNeY9ZY2saxLHLy3DR2gUU07fxlK0yUGIUBYXOSz84wDnOnykZ+75HzYop2 BVW4/7v8eJasyfFNbhXVfim7fLynpgX9sbn6dTOAW/4nMyHMQ6Fwz4aF2yD/C2jr wXbeBpTgRc7l949TTS4qeAnbPQvoxoZXizF8txf9J707dq8wYNKcUfLVbrJ0+fOT 03OX4ne4VuzbReClDPu6 =IXib -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fysxmgfym2tm5b3u--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161004143513.d6akxn2h4fcann5n>