Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 03:01:16 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl> To: Glenn Sieb <ges+lists@wingfoot.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading a 5.1-RELEASE-p10 system... Message-ID: <20041020010116.GC822@alex.lan> In-Reply-To: <41758B49.8040205@wingfoot.org> References: <417579FB.6090805@wingfoot.org> <20041019213837.GB822@alex.lan> <41758B49.8040205@wingfoot.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:46:49PM -0400, Glenn Sieb wrote: > Alex de Kruijff said the following on 10/19/2004 5:38 PM: > > >The anwser to this question is to long for me to write and its written > >down in the handbook. Please follow the instuctions in this chapter. > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge.html > > > > > Danke, Alex--since I'm not seeing anything unusual in there (though I > have to check UPDATING as well), I'm gathering this wasn't the upgrade > with the concerns my compadres have had. :) > > >FreeBSD-5 isn't stable jet although the tag exist. 5.3 is more stable > >than 5.2.1 and this runs fine on my box. > > > > > *nod* I'm in a planning stage here, not a doing stage yet.. :) Gerely speeking, STABLE doesn't mean things never gets broken. Most reliable are the RELEASE plus fixes. So don't follow 5-STABLE but 5-RELENG -- Alex Please copy the original recipients, otherwise I may not read your reply. WWW: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041020010116.GC822>