Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Dec 2018 11:21:15 -0800
From:      bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
To:        Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How much memory to compile www/chromium?
Message-ID:  <20181212192115.GA85583@www.zefox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20181212184149.ol44fon2unowu35q@squirrel.exwg.net>
References:  <20181212165313.GA84881@www.zefox.net> <20181212184149.ol44fon2unowu35q@squirrel.exwg.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:41:49PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## bob prohaska (fbsd@www.zefox.net):
> 
> > How much memory should be required for  
> > make -DBATCH
> > in www/chromium?
> 
> Quite a lot, multiple GBs.
> 
> 
> I'm not even sure if your SD card will survive that :)
> 
That's ok, I'm trying to discover what is and isn't practical on a Pi3

> > If this is expected, is there a way to reduce the number of
> > threads started by make?
> 
> See bsd.ports.mk: DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS (as in "make -DDISABLE_MAKE_JOBS").
>
Thank you, I think that's the information needed. Come to think of it, 
will the -j option, such as -j2, work in this situation also? Two threads
are much better than one 8-)

As it happens, the machine isn't stuck. Make still seems to be running, 
now it's up to [18466/30819], admittedly not making fast progress.  

I'll let it run for now, just to see what happens.

Thanks for your help,

bob prohaska




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181212192115.GA85583>